1

“Let me clarify that any negative effect of illegal content on X in the EU…may be relevant in the context of the ongoing proceedings and of the overall assessment of X’s compliance with EU law” -Thierry Breton, EU’s Internal Market commissioner.

The European Union’s Digital Services Act(DSA) reminded Musk that X of it. This is a new law that regulates what the European Union deems illegal content and disinformation on all social media platforms(i.e. websites).

Please keep in mind that this letter to Musk was in the wake of X.com’s allowing of users’ posting the truth about the civil unrest in the United Kingdom. Their government sees X as a threat and attempted to use their territorial laws in China-style action to dictate what everybody in the whole wide-world can see, hear, read quickly and know.

Thank God that we were smart enough in 1996 to have People of the United States of America (and of merit) create the basic ground rules of this new digital frontier we created for the military in the 1970’s. Unlike the E.U., or any other place in our world, we have CDA of 1996 Section 230 and Internet Network Neutrality that protects our digital freedoms here in America.

INTERNET FREEDOM OF SPEECH: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." -Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act

The above chart is telling. Ad fake news and low information voters voting it all away.

Please click or tap:

Subscribe now

Thank you

On Monday night, 8/12/24 at 8pm Eastern, Elon Musk talked to Trump LIVE on a radio-like audio stream presentation using X called Spaces. It is a great audio only platform.

It reminds me of an old telephone party line but for smartphones. The sheer overwhelming number of people trying to listen along with a denial of service attack by hackers got the conversation off to a long wait before it started.

But it was a great conversation and it was great having two billionaires talk about problems our great nation currently faces.

JUST ONE PROBLEM

Neither the president or the CEOs of either very large mega social media platforms, “X”(Musk) and TRUTH SOCIAL(Trump) talked about a big guerilla in the room: digital free speech, government labeled misinformation, Terms of Service censorship, the ability for anybody to use anybody else’s website(or social media platform) without liability to the data being published(or user interaction) and currently no liability to the website(or social media) owner nor the internet service provider(ISP) any liability to any and all data being published using that user’s connection no matter how he or she connects.

Nothing…nada. Even after the United Kingdom TODAY CURRENT NEWS partly blames Elon Musk for the civil unrest going on because the British government and EU wants to throw Mr. Musk in jail for inciting riots because he allows the honest truth to be posted about what is happening across the pond. But it violates that country’s censorship laws…telling the truth. But X, being an American company(a .COM and not .UK) is not under any global censorship laws. So, how does the European Union’s censorship effect the United States of America?

We have Section 230 and Net Neutrality that currently is supposed to protect us all in the USA. Each country can establish what they wish as law. Here in the United States, if we did not have Section 230 intact for almost 30 years now, we would not have digital freedom of speech and probably no free internet no matter who, what you wanted to connect to and free to transmit/receive data using any website(or social media platform anybody wants to use. And the only restriction is whether or not the people that own that website want to use their social media platform for that use based on THEIR terms…the owners’ terms, not any government.

The United Kingdom could easily block X or ban it like we have tried to screw TikTok here in the U.S. All websites or whatever can all do the same things as TikTok because the smartphones are each still capable of running the same routines of any program because the hardware is still always able to do it. They can’t. Because if they block X.com they become China and block all of X…every European on X. That would be a problem.

So, not only do we have an owner of one very big social media platform but we have the owner of another very large social media platform, who is already a convicted felon by the courts using massive kangaroo court style misinformation and gagging…

NEITHER MUSK OR TRUMP TALK ABOUT IT.

As I write this, I think about me staying up to listen about this topic of great interest to me. And I thought it would be the main thrust. They talked about everything but their wheelhouses.

The questions unanswered and never touched on which are paramount to the upcoming November 2024 election:

1. Will either X or Truth Social censor posts upon request of the federal government deeming any post misinformation when each platform knows it is not?

2. Do they both do that now?

3. Do they tell you if they remove something and why?

4. What if they change Section 230 to make everyone in a person’s internet connection liable?

5. After being suspended on Twitter and blatant election interference by Twitter, costing Trump an election by supression of the Hunter Biden laptop that could have easily elected Trump in 2020, wouldn’t that be worth talking about?

6. How does the CISA/FBI misinformation censorship marriage made in hell looking for users using AI that match a profile or hang with a certain group of people in a chat or X Space play out?

7. Where would we be if Elon Musk had not of bought Twitter or Trump start Truth Social?

8. What is your stand on protecting and keeping Section 230 intact and maintaining Net Neutrality?

Remember, it was the Trump administration who abolished Net Neutrality in December, 2017. It was the current Biden administration who restored it.

And a final thought. The Marxists in the Democrat party want to use the internet to criminalize free speech and monitor all of us by what each of us connect to…the TV that watches you. So, (9.) How do you both feel this plays into the 2024 election if Trump loses? Or wins?

Just please think about it, go ahead and click or tap the link to listen to it yourself to replay them:

TRUMP/MUSK Twitter X Space Audio Conversation

And please

Subscribe now

Thank you

It gives it away without a fight. Is that what we are now? I wonder what our ancestors would say about fighting for something they believed in, then have their offspring destroy everything they paid a high price for with their lives.

This is very basic and sometimes hard to understand. But failure of understanding and not acting leads to humans using whatever they can for power and money to control the whole planet.

We all ought to be very thankful that some very smart people in 1996 fought the Federal Government and laid down in very simple terms - in 26 words - that over the next 27 years now as the date of this article, has changed all of us and the United States of America forever. And right now, if you can read this and understand it (read it 10 times to understand it if you have to) our future can be created to be anything as a country for the rest of the world or change the world into anything we want it to be. The Communist Marxist Nazis understand this. This is how they are able to change the fabric of America in less than a decade, unrecognizable to what worked for a long time: God, common sense and the American brand.

Basically, what Section 230 means is that at the device level - the computer on your desk at home or in your lap or the smartphone in your hand…as far as the United States digital territory of the World Wide Web internet domains is concerned…whatever data (long “a”, the word ends with a vowel, please. Aye, Fonzy?) that is transmitted or received, you are not responsible for.

Okay, so what is the big deal? To answer that, I have to get you to understand how data is sent and received by a smartphone, for example. You ever wonder how the internet can be so damned fast? Imagine a railroad packed the whole railway with an endless loop of train cars all connected together operating like an assembly line belt - looping and looping over and over. Each train car has a car number and in each train car are individual packages all destined for other train cars on other endless railways running trains connected to other railways. All train cars keep moving at a very high blazing speed even if the train cars are empty - 24/7 and never stops. A package in a train car destined for another railway is snatched off of it’s train car while moving onto another train car on another railway without stopping. This is done repeatedly until the data package gets to the computer or smartphone the user sent it to. Then the process of receiving something back data-wise from whoever it is or whatever it is, is the same.

So, who is responsible for publishing data? And if someone or something was responsible for the data that was published, then who would it be? Should there be anyone? If your smartphone, as any computer, connected to the internet constantly sends and receives train cars empty or not; how can you be liable for every package sent or received from your smartphone just sitting there doing nothing in standby dark mode? The camera and mic could be on and you’d never know it, being devil’s advocate.

But you loaded the app? You checked and tapped “I agree” to the Terms of Service (ToS) of the app/website. Every app and website you use has Terms of Service.

So, why would any local, state or federal government pass a law governing what kind of data you can send and receive from your smartphone computer? How and why is any government/private entity analyzing or storing your data? How can you isolate what data content is banned or what websites/apps you decide to use and install on a smartphone computer that manipulates how you use your data (i.e., what you see and hear)? Why do you need a government babysitter censoring or even controlling your data (i.e., what you see and what you hear) on your smartphone computer? Why force everyone into digital censorship and banning content because most people neither read the website/app Terms of Service nor understand that a smartphone is metaphorically just like a pack of cigarettes? Why do all users have to comply with dumb people using lawfare trying to create something more identical to the United States Tax Code of thousands of pages to make cheap even free internet interactive services liable and open you to be sued; to regulate something easily understood written in twenty-six words just because other dumb people who don’t have a clue how to safely use a smartphone pack of cigarettes and then hand the smartphone pack of cigarettes to their own kids to just go toke away use their smartphone, anywhere unsupervised?

Just sign up with an account and provide your papers (an ID) to prove you are over 18 or 21 or whatever to access certain sites that before nobody had a right to look what was in your data. Don’t worry. The website will keep your credentials and verify you, similar to a national firearms registry so when someone decides to invade us like China and/or alphabet soup, they can just print off a list and know who is loving their guns to confiscate them.

Think about it. Why isn’t there just like started 40 years ago:“NO SMOKING” dining sections for smartphone computer users/smokers before smoking indoors was made illegal for everybody? How many people go to a dining room to hear somebody on a smartphone computer just completely oblivious to you, each other’s space, relaxation and digestion while they “puff” away? And the lack of respect for others and no modicum of courtesy toward fellow man, just like my generation and generations after, pick up on how adults treat each other. Look at what is now the result of decades of this, add migrants that won’t assimilate and wonder if we are even going to have a country left by the time we figure it out.

So, why? Whether it is TikTok, Facebook, X, XXX, XNXX, Pornhub, YouPorn, Debbie Does Dallas…whatever website/app it is…nothing on the internet is banned or censored for content unless you personally by your device want it to be. Why doesn’t your internet television stream provide XXX TV? Any website/app can so why not? YouTube could switch on hardcore porn channels right now for free. So could Pluto TV, just for example. What stops them? Not laws or government regulation, it is whatever the person(s) who bought and paid for their website maps out rules for in their Terms of Service(ToS).

Apps on a smartphone are different because they are not internet but cellular phone data transmission services connecting through the apps you load exclusively to Android or Apple hardware to connect you to the internet through their cellular connection to the internet.

Up until the last 3-5 years now, every user in America has not been liable for just solely using and accessing anything on the internet. But if anyone is already doing something that is already illegal whether or not they use internet or a smartphone computer; if you are caught of that crime and adjudicated by law passed by legislation already on the books then just investigate, prosecute the crime and uphold innocent until proven guilty no matter what communication method is used. Leave the internet interactive communication alone and treat it like electricity…just a connection to turn off/on like a lamp or a toaster.

But that gets into another future discussion - the other side of the coin: Net Neutrality. Stay tuned for an article(s) on that. The Trump FCC in December, 2017 gave that away in the middle of the night. And that is still a severe blow to network neutrality. Even after 6 years, a neutral internet has yet to be fully tested and now what used to be is no more. Most people don’t understand what it is and what they lost 6 years ago…more to come. I will explain why no net neutrality stifles innovation to a stop and brings up really stupid things like “equitable AI” that would really doom us all forever. They are well on there way unless we stop transhumanism in it’s tracks.

Why take the internet and pass laws limiting your connection, how you use your connection and discriminate against only certain privately owned websites/apps a user may use without a court ordered warrant signed by a judge? Right now, the government cannot use any data of yours illegally obtained for prosecution. Law enforcement spies on all of us all the time without warrant using the Patriot Act abound, but the difference is they cannot use it unless they have reasonable doubt, probable cause, warrant, etc. Since Section 230 protects your digital records from any liability or government digital enforcement at the device level, this is why you see the government seize smartphone computers(devices). Section 230 protects you and your Internet Service Provider(ISP) from any liability from what you and your interactive computer services (websites/apps) you access and interact with do on the internet, including publishing.

Your own service you buy that connects you to the internet has logs of every little bit of data they send and receive from and to you. They can at any time pull up every single mouse click, tap or scroll…everything that you do on your smartphone computer and can easily list what website/apps you go to(and sell all of that in a convenient data package to the highest bidder if you agree to it to get your smartphone computer).

Right now and ever since the internet was created, whoever provides any of us a connection to the internet - even for free - free WiFi - nobody is held liable for what you use your electricity for, I mean data connection. Say goodbye free WiFi and free website/apps interactive computer services if they change Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act and make websites/apps liable for using the internet. Say goodbye to inexpensively buying your own website/app/platform/social media and providing anything because what is now inexpensive will be much much more expensive and many things will no longer be allowed to “publish” because they won’t allow anything that threatens them being sued. Or they could hire a bunch of censors and engage spybots using AI to police users on a free privately owned website by you for idiots now making both of you liable for whatever they post that they know nothing about that could bankrupt them. This would include private messaging like Messenger and othe IM apps. Messages are published posts, too.

By now you are probably wondering then why there is a big deal about websites/apps hiding behind Section 230 for shadow banning content, deleting content, blocking content, etc. and etc. Are you a publisher or are you not?

First, you have to stop thinking about a smartphone computer like just a television or radio with rabbit ears. What is the big deal with algorithms? Well, did you know that I can go to like Facebook, for example, and my friend next to me can go on their smartphone computer to Facebook at the same time. But what comes up on each of our screens are completely different. Why?

Each user has Facebook configured differently. Mine goes into my Facebook account and yours goes into yours. And then based on how you have interacted with Facebook and others you associate with determines what comes up on each person’s screen. So the person(s) who run the website can block, ban, publish anything they want if you use their stuff. If you create your own website or app, your rules govern the whole website/app. So, then how can a state in the union put restrictions on a website at the website level for whatever the content is and track the users for wanting to use the service out of literally millions of other websites because they deem the content a certain way?

What if you wanted to create your own internet pornography videos website? Do you really want to verify and keep records on people to access your site under penalty of law? Who is going to pay for that? The government cannot even keep elections secure so how can they ask you to do what they can’t do?

This is obviously the wrong approach. Are VPN’s going to be illegal next? How about things like PGP software or did they already ruin that? Things that for almost 30+ years have been the same when most of you didn’t even know how to turn a computer on, much less boot it. It used to begin a given not to believe whatever is on the internet and take it as a value added resource.

The only way that governments can police this and enforce anything they come up with is by staying connected in real time to all of our internet service providers (Comcast, T-Mobile, Cox, AT&T, etc.) so they can run bots to read your logs of what you use the internet service you bought and paid for to be able to see everything anything you have connected to the internet. So, here we go again. Take the information they gather on your internet use and store it for future use to help find a crime when they need one on you.

If you allow records to be kept to log on to a porn site, then what is the difference when a government requires verification to view an online church service? China does that. If you are under 18 in China it is illegal to go to a Christian church unless you are 18 years old.

The whole reason Section 230 was formed is because of pornography. Who is the government to tell you what data you can or cannot interact with on your smartphone? My solution to keep minors from accessing the wrong media, whatever it is? Here are some very simple steps:

1.) Don’t allow minors to have a smartphone unsupervised.

2.) Treat all smartphones in society just like a pack of cigarettes.

3.) All minors must have their smartphones secure in Faraday bags during school and stored like coats in a coat room until after school.

4.) If a minor is allowed to use a smartphone, make sure only the adult can own the minor’s smartphone and make the parents liable for any interactions the minor uses his or her phone for.

5.) Make it mandatory that the minor’s parent/guardian has the tools readily available and configured to audit their child’s ISP and have the adult sign off on the child’s smartphone like every quarter or 2 or 3 times a year. If the parent/guardian fails at certifying the minor’s device, then flag it.

Think about a Faraday bag like Section 230. When you put a smartphone computer in a sealed Faraday bag, no radio frequencies(RF) can go in or out through the bagthe smartphone computer is in. No data or phone service can be sent or received while it is in the bag.

Section 230 is like a virtual Faraday bag. Don’t let them change it. And in order to access anything on the internet you have to have device capable of accessing the internet. And it is not a TV signal. Different people can all go to the same sites and get a totally different experience.

Winchester, Va., June 30, 2023 -

An interesting visit to Glen Burnie today. I refer to the whole grounds as Glen Burnie, living and growing up beside it for years. It has always been an area of mystacy and respect from the locals growing up here like me.

I even got most of my education from dwelling in this very area. Does anyone want to hear my stories of the Winchester Police Department trying to corner and herd a Glen Burnie bull, who got out from a hole in their fence? Well, thankfully they didn’t have to shoot it but seeing them have their guns drawn for their own protection and neighbors out try to help, all we needed was a red shrowd and say “Olay!” But that was wild. The bull would charge and everybody run for cover. Those were the days.

Anyway, I took a walk and took a few photos. Kinda a cool but I couldn’t help wonder? But that is the point, isn’t it? Hopefully, I will add to the article with a follow up and photos from the other half. These photos are from the east side and doesn’t include the wetland. They are doing an interesting job and the staff is very nice. Some of the art and where it is is questionable and art always is, as long as there are no feelings of an undertone establishment of anything - not much history here.

For locals like me, I keep asking myself “Isn’t Dinosaurland supposed to be in Double Tailgate?” Now it’s behind Harry Byrd’s house and Handley. I don’t know. Call me an art critic. The unlit clan candles in the woods and Muslim moon statue near the Old New John Kerr in the heart of it - idk, man…seems like a message. But what do I know and it is just my opinion. I love art and I should have taken the class. It takes a very special art teacher to recognize gifts.

And both one of my class sponsors and another - my next door neighbor - both of them moved to Winchester, loved and contributed to her contributions, society, freedom, history and liberty. And they both were forming parts of the Shenandoah Arts Council and supporters of the Museum of the Shenandoah Valley.

It is not at all what I expected but maybe I’ll try out the tree house.

And this walking bridge? All Trex, Winchester, Virginia USA made. Looks like wood but it is very nice and sturdy:

Winchester, Va., June 6, 2023 -

Every year Confederate Memorial Day comes around. Each year, just like with all America’s troops who fought in any American war fought, the graves of fallen soldiers are marked with an American flag. Nowadays, a very commom misconception, that was a well known and understood at the core of our town’s (or city’s) overwhelming diverse & USA founding history fact(s), is that Confederates did not fight and die in service of their country.

Indeed they did! They protected it - Winchester and our way of Christian life. We all knew it. It was a given so much we forgot it and let counter to that move in.

These people on Memorial Day every year do not get on American flag on their graves. They get ignored. BUT, these patriots get a special day! Why? Because no matter the reason (pick one nowadays), these people stood up when their own country tried to get their own people of their state to stand up and shoot their neighbors; based on the Commonwealth being thrown under the bus in the fight over slavery (pick any reason for any war - usually people that don’t speak up for decades while making a buck off people’s misery) and then leave everybody - somebody - holding the bag. Then all of our sons and daughters pay for it with their lives.

Here, we honor those who have fallen and those who came to our aid. Check back as I update this article with more pictures and nice people who love history. We have too much great history her in Winchester. June should be “Patriot Month” with July 4rth coming up. WE should be united as a whole. We should not have a holiday based on any race, creed or color. Nor should we celebrate one group of people at the cost of any other group(s) of people.

July 4, 1776, WE ALL GOT FREED! And look out. They want to do it all over again while you pay for it, not only with your money but with blood and families.